[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
FTA-N-More.Net For your True FTA Needs 2012-08-25T06:38:20-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/feed.php?f=27 2012-08-25T06:38:20-05:00 2012-08-25T06:38:20-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1705&p=2321#p2321 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Who inherits your iTunes library?]]>
Someone who owned 10,000 hardcover books and the same number of vinyl records could bequeath them to descendants, but legal experts say passing on iTunes and Kindle libraries would be much more complicated.

And one’s heirs stand to lose huge sums of money. “I find it hard to imagine a situation where a family would be OK with losing a collection of 10,000 books and songs,” says Evan Carroll, co-author of “Your Digital Afterlife.” “Legally dividing one account among several heirs would also be extremely difficult.”

Part of the problem is that with digital content, one doesn’t have the same rights as with print books and CDs. Customers own a license to use the digital files—but they don’t actually own them.

Apple AAPL+0.09% and Amazon.com AMZN+1.88% grant “nontransferable” rights to use content, so if you buy the complete works of the Beatles on iTunes, you cannot give the White Album to your son and Abbey Road to your daughter.

According to Amazon’s terms of use, “You do not acquire any ownership rights in the software or music content.” Apple limits the use of digital files to Apple devices used by the account holder.

“That account is an asset and something of value,” says Deirdre R. Wheatley-Liss, an estate planning attorney at Fein, Such, Kahn & Shepard in Parsippany, N.J.

But can it be passed on to one’s heirs?

Most digital content exists in a legal black hole. “The law is light years away from catching up with the types of assets we have in the 21st Century,” says Wheatley-Liss. In recent years, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Indiana, Oklahoma and Idaho passed laws to allow executors and relatives access to email and social networking accounts of those who’ve died, but the regulations don’t cover digital files purchased.

Apple and Amazon did not respond to requests for comment.

There are still few legal and practical ways to inherit e-books and digital music, experts say. And at least one lawyer has a plan to capitalize on what may become be a burgeoning market. David Goldman, a lawyer in Jacksonville, says he will next month launch software, DapTrust, to help estate planners create a legal trust for their clients’ online accounts that hold music, e-books and movies. “With traditional estate planning and wills, there’s no way to give the right to someone to access this kind of information after you’re gone,” he says.

Here’s how it works: Goldman will sell his software for $150 directly to estate planners to store and manage digital accounts and passwords. And, while there are other online safe-deposit boxes like AssetLock and ExecutorSource that already do that, Goldman says his software contains instructions to create a legal trust for accounts. “Having access to digital content and having the legal right to use it are two totally different things,” he says.

The simpler alternative is to just use your loved one’s devices and accounts after they’re gone—as long as you have the right passwords.

Chester Jankowski, a New York-based technology consultant, says he’d look for a way to get around the licensing code written into his 15,000 digital files. “Anyone who was tech-savvy could probably find a way to transfer those files onto their computer—without ending up in Guantanamo,” he says. But experts say there should be an easier solution, and a way such content can be transferred to another’s account or divided between several people.“We need to reform and update intellectual-property law,” says Dazza Greenwood, lecturer and researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Media Lab.

Technology pros say the need for such reform is only going to become more pressing. “A significant portion of our assets is now digital,” Carroll says. U.S. consumers spend nearly $30 on e-books and MP3 files every month, or $360 a year, according to e-commerce company Bango. Apple alone has sold 300 million iPods and 84 million iPads since their launches. Amazon doesn’t release sales figures for the Kindle Fire, but analysts estimate it has nearly a quarter of the U.S. tablet market.

Statistics: Posted by ces — Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:38 am


]]>
2010-12-07T12:35:47-05:00 2010-12-07T12:35:47-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1495&p=1991#p1991 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Move over Harry Potter Meta-Flex is here]]>
http://urlsnippet.com/METAFLEX

Such materials have been created before, but Metaflex is significant because it not only allows manipulation of light, but it can also be used on a flexible surface. Until now similar metamaterials have only been possible on a hard, rigid surface.

Adding flexibility means that an invisible cloak could eventually be made. More practically, it means making clothing that allows the wearer to turn invisible will be easier to manufacture.

Writing about Metaflex in the New Journal of Physics the researchers said:


Arguably, one of the most exciting applications of Metaflex is to fabricate three-dimensional flexible MMs (metamaterials) in the optical range, which can be achieved by stacking several Metaflex membranes on top of one another.

These results confirm that it is possible to realise MMs on flexible substrates and operating in the visible regime, which we believe are ideal building blocks for future generations of three-dimensional flexible MMs at optical wavelengths.

Metaflex may bring to mind images of walking around invisible, but it also has applications for producing much better lenses called superlenses. It also opens the way for new projects to research what other uses Metaflex could have in different fields

Statistics: Posted by Digi — Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:35 pm


]]>
2010-12-07T10:02:20-05:00 2010-12-07T10:02:20-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1494&p=1990#p1990 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Australia's Outback Could Get Web Via TV Antenna]]> Statistics: Posted by The_Hatta — Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:02 am


]]>
2010-12-02T21:48:48-05:00 2010-12-02T21:48:48-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1449&p=1953#p1953 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Re: So I got a DMCA notice from Comcast]]> Statistics: Posted by ces — Thu Dec 02, 2010 9:48 pm


]]>
2010-12-01T11:53:45-05:00 2010-12-01T11:53:45-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1456&p=1948#p1948 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • The Pirate Bay Co-Founder Starting A P2P Based DNS To Take O]]> Statistics: Posted by The_Hatta — Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:53 am


]]>
2010-11-30T10:08:57-05:00 2010-11-30T10:08:57-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1455&p=1945#p1945 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Memory card format proposed]]> Bigger and faster


STORAGE MEDIA MAKERS Sandisk, Sony, and Nikon are prepping a high-speed memory card format with up to 2TB capacities.

The companies are working together on the format, running their proposals past the Compactflash Association (CFA) and the international standards organisation to get the format signed off.

Sandisk, Sony, and Nikon are putting the specifications for the new format together to meet the demands of professional photographers. However, with memory cards getting used in nearly everything these days, the format has the potential to be used in a wide range of electronic gadgets including smartphones, tablets and computers.

At the moment, the Compactflash Association's CF6.0 has a maximum transfer rate of only 167MB/sec. That speed bump was released just this month so Sandisk, Sony, and Nikon's proposed transfer rate of 500MB/sec per second is a huge jump. If it does get signed off by the CFA and international standards organisation, the format will have the jump on much slower and smaller competitors, including Sony's own proprietary memory stock format, which ties users in to buying Sony branded hardware.

The proposed specifications will reach up to 500MB/sec by using a PCI Express interface rather than Compactflash's current PATA interface. Some of Sony's own memory formats have the same theoretical maximum capacity of 2TB but not at the speeds proposed by this format.

"This ultra high-speed media format will enable further evolution of hardware and imaging applications, and widen the memory card options available to CompactFlash users such as professional photographers," said the chairman of the CFA board, Shigeto Kanda.

"This next generation format is expected to be widely adapted to various products, including those other than high-end DSLRs.

Statistics: Posted by The_Hatta — Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:08 am


]]>
2010-11-29T18:33:15-05:00 2010-11-29T18:33:15-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1449&p=1940#p1940 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Re: So I got a DMCA notice from Comcast]]>
Also I should clarify that it was seeding that got me caught, not actually downloading. I finished downloading it over a week ago but got the DMCA notice a couple days ago. So if I would've closed the torrent when I finished downloading instead of leaving it open for seeding, I wouldn't have gotten caught. That's actually a common misconception. Its not downloading(in most cases) that get you in trouble. Its uploading.

Statistics: Posted by Digi — Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:33 pm


]]>
2010-11-29T18:32:06-05:00 2010-11-29T18:32:06-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1449&p=1939#p1939 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • So I got a DMCA notice from Comcast]]>
Abuse Incident Number:
Report Date/Time: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:52:35 -0600

Dear Comcast High-Speed Internet Subscriber:

Comcast has received a notification by a copyright owner, or its authorized agent, reporting an alleged infringement of one or more copyrighted works made on or over Comcast's High-Speed Internet service (the 'Service'). The copyright owner has identified the Internet Protocol ('IP') address associated with your Service account at the time as the source of the infringing works. The works identified by the copyright owner in its notification are listed below. Comcast reminds you that use of the Service (or any part of the Service) in any manner that constitutes an infringement of any copyrighted work is a violation of Comcast's Acceptable Use Policy and may result in the suspension or termination of your Service account.

If you have any questions regarding this notice, you may direct them to Comcast in writing by sending a letter or e-mail to:

Comcast Customer Security Assurance
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
1800 Bishops Gate Blvd., 3rd Floor East Wing
Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 U.S.A.
Phone: (888) 565-4329
Fax: (856) 324-2940

For more information regarding Comcast's copyright infringement policy, procedures, and contact information, please read our Acceptable Use Policy by clicking on the Terms of Service link at »www.comcast.net.

Sincerely,
Comcast Customer Security Assurance

Copyright work(s) identified in the notification of claimed infringement:

Evidentiary Information:
Notice ID:
Asset: WALL STREET 2: MONEY NEVER SLEEPS
Protocol: BitTorrent
IP:
DNS:
Port ID: 13300
File Name: Wall.Street.Money.Never.Sleeps.2010.R5.LiNE.XviD-LAP
File Size: 1478922138
Timestamp: 2010-11-21 17:46:03.543 GMT
Last Seen Date: 2010-11-21 17:46:03.543 GMT=0A=0AIf you have some issue=
s please reply to fox.antipiracy@dtecnet.com, reply to no-reply@dtecnet.=
After 10 years or so of pirating every type of file you can think of using every protocol you can think of(mostly Bit Torrent nowadays), I've finally been caught. Is this just a warning or is somebody gonna sue me? There's no indication further action is going be taken. Unless Comcast hasn't gotten around to cutting of my internet service yet. It is a holiday weekend. It only says that may happen though.

I always wondered what I had to do to get caught. I feel like Frank Abgnail Jr or something. Maybe instead of suing me they'll make me a consultant on movie piracy. Leonardo Dicaprio can play me in the movie. Catch Me Downloading If You Can.

Seriously though. Is this just a warning or an initial notification of suit being filed against me. I've never heard of anyone else getting a warning though.

Statistics: Posted by Digi — Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:32 pm


]]>
2010-11-29T11:59:48-05:00 2010-11-29T11:59:48-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1442&p=1937#p1937 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Re: Prison terms of Pirate Bay executives' shortened]]>
If there's a bit of good news for supporters of The Pirate Bay, it's that the verdict has seemingly done little to achieve the prosecutors' goal of damaging the site. The site is still online and is as active as ever. It is now registered in the Seychelles, an island nation known for its lose copyright laws. And rather than a small set of individuals, which could be prosecuted, the site is now run by a larger organization.

Statistics: Posted by sparky — Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:59 am


]]>
2010-11-27T13:03:52-05:00 2010-11-27T13:03:52-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1441&p=1927#p1927 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Re: U.S. Government Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain a]]> Statistics: Posted by Digi — Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:03 pm


]]>
2010-11-27T11:34:59-05:00 2010-11-27T11:34:59-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1442&p=1926#p1926 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Prison terms of Pirate Bay executives' shortened]]> Statistics: Posted by ces — Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:34 am


]]>
2010-11-27T11:32:13-05:00 2010-11-27T11:32:13-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1441&p=1925#p1925 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • U.S. Government Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain and M]]> Statistics: Posted by ces — Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:32 am


]]>
2010-11-27T11:28:41-05:00 2010-11-27T11:28:41-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1440&p=1924#p1924 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Homeland Security seizes domain names]]> Statistics: Posted by ces — Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:28 am


]]>
2010-11-22T10:04:38-05:00 2010-11-22T10:04:38-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1423&p=1899#p1899 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Ron Wyden saves Internet from censorship bill COICA]]> Statistics: Posted by Digi — Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:04 am


]]>
2010-10-31T22:10:58-05:00 2010-10-31T22:10:58-05:00 http://www.fta-n-more.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1326&p=1813#p1813 <![CDATA[General Technology Discussions • Re: Television broadcasters block Google TV]]> Statistics: Posted by Prodigy — Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:10 pm


]]>